Posts Tagged ‘global’

A TOXICOLOGY SUMMARY OF THE FOLLOWING GEOENGINEERING INGREDIENTS: jorma Jyrkkanen, Toxicology Reviewer 2026-04-11

April 11, 2026

Ingredients Emitted: aluminum oxide, barium, strontium, and lithium. But wait, there’s more! Some reports also mention the use of coal fly ash, human plasma, unknown pathogens, nanotechnology, and even graphene oxide. Source Public Posts

Grok Thought for 36s

Toxicology summaries below are drawn from authoritative sources such as the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) toxicological profiles, EPA assessments, and peer-reviewed studies. These focus on known health effects by relevant exposure routes (especially inhalation for aerosol contexts), dose-dependency, and key targets.

atsdr.cdc.gov +1

Toxicity always depends on dose, duration, form (e.g., soluble vs. insoluble, particle size), route, and individual factors (e.g., age, nutrition, pre-existing disease). Environmental background levels of these substances are typically low and not associated with harm; occupational or high-dose exposures are the primary concern in the data.Aluminum Oxide (Al₂O₃)Aluminum oxide is a common, relatively insoluble form of aluminum. Low-level exposure occurs naturally via food, water, air, and soil with minimal absorption and no clear harm.

atsdr.cdc.gov

Key effects:

  • Inhalation (primary concern for aerosols/dust): High occupational exposure to respirable dust causes respiratory irritation, coughing, abnormal chest X-rays, and in some cases pulmonary fibrosis or alveolar proteinosis. Animal studies show lung inflammation and macrophage accumulation at elevated levels. atsdr.cdc.gov
  • Neurological: High aluminum exposure can affect the nervous system (e.g., impaired neurobehavioral performance in animals); human links (e.g., to Alzheimer’s) remain inconclusive and unproven for the oxide form specifically.
  • Other: Poorly absorbed orally or dermally; not classified as a human carcinogen for non-fibrous forms. No significant reproductive/developmental toxicity at typical exposures.
  • Regulatory: OSHA PEL ≈ 15 mg/m³ (total dust), 5 mg/m³ (respirable); ACGIH TLV 10 mg/m³ for aluminum oxide. atsdr.cdc.gov

BariumBarium compounds vary widely in solubility—soluble forms (e.g., barium chloride, carbonate) are far more toxic than insoluble ones (e.g., barium sulfate).

atsdr.cdc.gov

Key effects:

  • Acute high-dose (oral or inhalation): Gastrointestinal distress (vomiting, cramps, diarrhea), followed by hypokalemia (low potassium) leading to muscle weakness/paralysis, cardiac arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia), hypertension/hypotension, and potentially death. Inhalation of high airborne levels can produce similar systemic effects. atsdr.cdc.gov
  • Chronic: Possible kidney damage; limited evidence of reproductive/developmental effects in animals at very high doses.
  • Inhalation: Respiratory tract is a sensitive target; irritation possible.
  • Carcinogenicity: Not classified as a human carcinogen.
  • Note: Background air/water levels are low (<0.05 μg/m³ air; ~30 μg/L water average).

Strontium (Stable/Non-Radioactive Form)Stable strontium has low toxicity at environmental levels; it mimics calcium but is a poorer substitute.

atsdr.cdc.gov

Key effects:

  • Skeletal (oral, high dose): In children/juveniles with poor calcium/protein intake, excess strontium can impair bone mineralization, leading to rickets-like effects or abnormal bone growth. Adults are far less sensitive.
  • Inhalation: Pure stable strontium compounds show low toxicity; no major systemic effects reported at relevant levels.
  • Other: No evidence of carcinogenicity, neurotoxicity, or reproductive harm for stable strontium at typical exposures. (Strontium chromate is carcinogenic due to hexavalent chromium, not strontium.)
  • Radioactive strontium (e.g., Sr-90): Bone-seeking; high exposure causes bone marrow suppression, anemia, and increased cancer risk (leukemia, bone cancer)—not relevant to stable forms.

LithiumLithium (typically as salts) has a narrow therapeutic window; it is used medically for bipolar disorder but becomes toxic at higher exposures.

epa.gov

Key effects:

  • Neurological: Tremor, confusion, ataxia, seizures, coma at toxic serum levels.
  • Renal: Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (excessive urination/thirst), impaired kidney concentrating ability, potential chronic kidney disease with long-term high exposure.
  • Other: Thyroid dysfunction (goiter), gastrointestinal upset, cardiac effects (arrhythmias). EPA provisional chronic oral RfD is 20 μg/kg/day based on nephrotoxicity. files.knowyourh2o.com
  • Acute high exposure: Can be life-threatening; monitoring of serum levels is critical in medical use.

Coal Fly AshCoal fly ash is a complex mixture of aluminosilicates plus concentrated heavy metals (As, Pb, Cd, Cr, Hg, etc.), often 2–10× higher than in source coal. It is not a single “ingredient” but a source of multiple toxicants.

sciencedirect.com

Key effects:

  • Inhalation of particles: Respiratory inflammation, oxidative stress (ROS generation), lung injury, reduced antimicrobial defense in airways, potential cardiovascular effects, and genotoxicity/DNA damage. Chronic exposure linked to increased lung cancer risk and systemic metal toxicity.
  • Leaching into water: Heavy metals cause neurodevelopmental harm (Pb), cancer (As, Cr), kidney/liver damage, and other systemic effects.
  • Overall: Toxicity driven by bioavailable metals and fine/ultrafine particles; oxidative stress and inflammation are central mechanisms. Not inherently “pathogenic” but hazardous due to contaminants. psr.org

Human PlasmaHuman plasma is a biological fluid (not a chemical toxin). If aerosolized (highly atypical), it would not act as a classic toxicant but could trigger immune/allergic responses, hypersensitivity, or—if contaminated—transmit blood-borne pathogens. No standard chemical toxicology profile exists; it is regulated as a biohazard in medical settings rather than an environmental pollutant.Unknown PathogensWithout identification, no specific toxicology summary is possible. Viable aerosolized pathogens could cause infectious disease (respiratory, systemic, etc.) depending on the organism, dose, and host immunity. Risk is inherently unpredictable and potentially severe.Nanotechnology (General)“Nano” refers to engineered particles <100 nm. Effects are highly material-specific (size, shape, surface chemistry, composition). General concerns include greater lung penetration, oxidative stress, inflammation, cellular uptake, and potential translocation to other organs. Toxicity varies widely—some nanomaterials are inert; others cause cytotoxicity or genotoxicity in high-dose lab studies. No single profile applies.Graphene OxideGraphene oxide (GO) toxicity is dose-, size-, and purity-dependent. In vitro and animal studies show cytotoxicity via oxidative stress (ROS), mitochondrial dysfunction, reduced glutathione, DNA damage, and apoptosis.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Key effects:

  • Cellular/lung: Inflammation, lung injury/edema at high doses in animals; potential for oxidative damage.
  • Human data: A controlled acute inhalation study of highly purified, thin (1–2 nm) nanometer-sized GO nanosheets in healthy volunteers found no adverse effects on lung function, cardiovascular parameters, or inflammation markers. nature.com
  • Overall: Risk appears low for acute, low-dose, high-purity exposures but higher with impurities or chronic high exposure. Long-term data are limited.

Bottom line: These substances have well-documented toxicity profiles at sufficiently high exposures, primarily via inhalation (respiratory/systemic effects) or ingestion (metal-specific effects). Real-world atmospheric concentrations in most locations remain far below levels linked to harm. Official geoengineering research has focused on other materials (e.g., sulfates), and claims of widespread deployment of the above lack verified evidence. Consult medical professionals for exposure concerns; data are from controlled studies and occupational epidemiology, not speculative scenarios.

Be aware government sites have in many instances been compromised in recent years by corporate influencers with conflicts of interest, hirees, corruption, and military secrecy regarding weaponization of substances to increase toxicity so its possible this toxicology summary is a gross understatement.

Zbigniew Brzezinsky Grand Chessboard Still Operational 2023-02-05 Jorma A Jyrkkanen, BSC,PDP

February 6, 2023

Who Was Zbigniew Brzezinski and how does he affect US foreign Policy Today?
Integrated Geostrategy to Dominate Eurasia and then the World and Eliminate Governments w Everyone under American Control.

See Video Here: https://youtu.be/dnBMB3fUOGo

More Stepping Stones to Dominatrix

BOMBINGS, COUPS, ATTEMPTED REGIME CHANGES, INTERFERENCES AMERICA MADE

NEXT

He was and Advisor for President Johnson and Jimmy Carter. Involved in Afghanistanapparently assisting the AlQaeda which America created to attack Russia n Afghanistan and justify Interventions in the Middle East. Born in Warsaw Poland. Brought up among NAZIS and Hated the Soviet Union and apparently Russians. Hatred possibly Tainted his policy advice to US Presidents.

The town of Brzeżany is thought to be the source of the family name. Brzezinski’s parents were Leonia (née Roman) Brzezińska and Tadeusz Brzeziński, a Polish diplomat who was posted to Germany from 1931 to 1935; Zbigniew Brzezinski thus spent some of his earliest years witnessing the rise of the Nazis.

Brzezinski’s father was a prominent member of the Polish government who was appointed ambassador to Canada in 1938. When Soviet-backed communists took over the Polish government in 1945, the Brzezinski family was stranded in Canada. After this event Brzezinski harboured a deep opposition to communism and the Soviet Union.

In their own words.

And lastly an interesting addendum. Locked together in Controlville. Operation Mockingbird?

Global dispersion of Biolabs also provides strategically locations to release pathogens for pandemics requiring vaccines tailored for population domination.
THE LAST STAGE IN GETTING GLOBAL DOMINION IS OF COURSE TAKING OUT CHINA. THIS IS INFOMATIVE IN THAT REGARD.
US military “setting the theatre” for war with China
Peter Symonds
@SymondsWSWS
9 January 2023

In a remarkably frank interview with the Financial Times yesterday, the top US Marine general in Japan declared that US-NATO successes against Russia in Ukraine were a product of advance planning and preparations—“setting the theatre” for war in military jargon. That was exactly what the Pentagon was doing in Japan and Asia, he explained, in preparing for conflict against China over Taiwan.
A US Marine launching a Javelin shoulder-fired anti-tank missile during the Resolute Dragon 22 exercise last year. [Photo: Cpl Scott Aubuchon/US Marine Corps]

“Why have we achieved the level of success we’ve achieved in Ukraine?” Lieutenant General James Bierman asked rhetorically. A big part of it, he explained, was that after what he termed “Russian aggression” in 2014 and 2015, “we earnestly got after preparing for future conflict: training for the Ukrainians, pre-positioning of supplies, identification of sites from which we could operate support, sustain operations.”

“We call that setting the theatre. And we are setting the theatre in Japan, in the Philippines, in other locations.” In other words, the US is setting a trap for China by goading it into taking military action against Taiwan in the same way that it provoked Russia into invading Ukraine following the US-backed coup in 2014 that toppled a pro-Russian government.

Lieutenant General James Bierman is commanding general of the Third Marine Expeditionary Force (III MEF) and of Marine Forces Japan. Significantly, the III MEF is the only Marine crisis response force permanently stationed outside the US. In other words, Bierman and his Marines would be on the front line of any US-led conflict with China.

As the Financial Times explained, the III MEF is “at the heart of a sweeping reform of the Marine Corps.” Its focus is being shifted from the “war on terror” in the Middle East to “creating small units that specialise in operating quickly and clandestinely in the islands and straits of east Asia and the western Pacific to counter Beijing’s ‘anti-access area denial’ strategG THE STA
SETTING THE STAGE BY RINGING CHINA WITH AMERICAN MILITARY BASESTO LAUNCH OPERATIONS AND INTERCEPT MISSILES AND LAUNCH SAME

The US plans for war against China—known as AirSea Battle—envisage a massive air and missile assault on Chinese military bases and strategic industries supported by warships and submarines. The Pentagon has been increasingly concerned about China’s military abilities to defend its territory and secure neighbouring seas—“anti access area denial” with its own missiles and naval vessels.
WOMEN IN THE MARSHALL ISLANDS HAD JELLYFISH BABIES FROM TEST FALLOUT POLLUTION.

Obama committed trillions of dollars to nuclear weapons and space war and China is the Enemy that was selected for all those weapons. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAfeYMONj9E
US war preparations with Japan are proceeding apace. As Bierman boasted, the two militaries have “seen exponential increases . . . just over the last year” in their activities on territory from which they would operate during a war. In recent exercises, the Marines for the first time established bilateral ground tactical co-ordination centres rather than liaising with a separate Japanese command point.