Posts Tagged ‘vaccines’

Smallpox Vaccination Programs and AIDS Probably Part of the Story. Was AIDS in Batches of Variola Vaccines and if so How Did it Get There? 2023-07-06. Jorma Jyrkkanen

July 6, 2023

Historical

Haiti and the Dominican Republic.

Exposure to smallpox during early Spanish attempts to convert the Native populations to plantation slavery exterminated all 3.5 million Native inhabitants of the region.

Africa

African epidemics

Variola lesions on chest and arms

One of the oldest records of what may have been an encounter with smallpox in Africa is associated with the elephant war circa AD 568 CE, when after fighting a siege in Mecca, Ethiopian troops contracted the disease which they carried with them back to Africa.[citation needed]

Arab ports in Coastal towns in Africa likely contributed to the importation of smallpox into Africa, as early as the 13th century, though no records exist until the 16th century. Upon invasion of these towns by tribes in the interior of Africa, a severe epidemic affected all African inhabitants while sparing the Portuguese. Densely populated areas of Africa connected to the Mediterranean, Nubia and Ethiopia by caravan route likely were affected by smallpox since the 11th century, though written records do not appear until the introduction of the slave trade in the 16th century.[3]

The enslavement of Africans continued to spread smallpox to the entire continent, with raiders pushing farther inland along caravan routes in search of people to enslave. The effects of smallpox could be seen along caravan routes, and those who were not affected along the routes were still likely to become infected either waiting to be put onboard or on board ships.[3]

Smallpox in Angola was likely introduced shortly after Portuguese settlement of the area in 1484. The 1864 epidemic killed 25,000 inhabitants, one third of the total population in that same area. In 1713, an outbreak occurred in South Africa after a ship from India docked at Cape Town, bringing infected laundry ashore. Many of the settler European population suffered, and whole clans of the Khoisan people were wiped out. A second outbreak occurred in 1755, again affecting both the white population and the Khoisan. The disease spread further, completely eradicating several Khosian clans, all the way to the Kalahari desert. A third outbreak in 1767 similarly affected the Khoisan and Bantu peoples. But the European colonial settlers were not affected nearly to the extent that they were in the first two outbreaks, it has been speculated this is because of variolation. Continued enslavement operations brought smallpox to Cape Town again in 1840, taking the lives of 2500 people, and then to Uganda in the 1840s. It is estimated that up to eighty percent of the Griqua tribe was exterminated by smallpox in 1831, and whole tribes were being wiped out in Kenya up until 1899. Along the Zaire river basin were areas where no one survived the epidemics, leaving the land devoid of human life. In Ethiopia and the Sudan, six epidemics are recorded for the 19th century: 1811–1813, 1838–1839, 1865–1866, 1878–1879, 1885–1887, and 1889–1890.[31]

Epidemics in the Americas

YearLocationDescription
1520–1527Mexico, Central America, South AmericaSmallpox kills 5-8 millions of native inhabitants of Mexico. Unintentionally introduced at Veracruz with the arrival of Panfilo de Narvaez on April 23, 1520, and was credited with the victory of Cortes over the Aztec empire at Tenochtitlan (present-day Mexico City) in 1521. Kills the Inca ruler, Huayna Capac, and 200,000 others and weakens the Incan Empire.
1561–1562ChileNo precise numbers on deaths exist in contemporary records but it is estimated that natives lost 20 to 25 percent of their population. According to Alonso de Góngora Marmolejo, so many Indian laborers died that the Spanish gold mines had to shut down.[33]
1588–1591Central ChileA combined smallpox, measles and typhus plague strikes Central Chile contributing to a decline of indigenous populations.[34]
1617–1619North America northern east coastKilled 90% of the Massachusetts Bay Indians
1655Chillán, Central ChileAn outbreak of smallpox occurred among refugees from Chillán as the city was evacuated amidst the Mapuche uprising of 1655. Spanish authorities put this group in effective quarantine decreeing death sentences for anyone crossing Maule River north.[35]
1674Cherokee TribeDeath count unknown. Population in 1674 about 50,000. After 1729, 1738, and 1753 smallpox epidemics their population was only 25,000 when they were forced to Oklahoma on the Trail Of Tears.
1692Boston, MA
1702–1703St. Lawrence Valley, NY
1721Boston, MAA British sailor disembarking the HMS Seahorse brought smallpox to Boston. 5759 people were infected and 844 died.
1736Pennsylvania
1738South Carolina
1770sWest Coast of North AmericaAt least 30% (tens of thousands) of the Northwestern Native Americans die from smallpox[36][37]
1781–1783Great Lakes
1830sAlaskaReduced Dena’ina Athabaskan population in Cook Inlet region of southcentral Alaska by half.[38] Smallpox also devastated Yup’ik Eskimo populations in western Alaska.
1836–1840Great Plains1837 Great Plains smallpox epidemic
1860–1861Pennsylvania
1862British Columbia, Washington state & Russian AmericaKnown as the Great Smallpox of 1862, an outbreak of smallpox in a large encampment of all indigenous peoples from around the colony on June 10, 1862, dispersed by order of the government to return to their homes, resulted in the deaths of 50-90% of the indigenous peoples in the region[39][40][41][42][43]
1865–1873Philadelphia, PA, New York, Boston, MA and New Orleans, LASame period of time, in Washington D.C., Baltimore, MD, Memphis, TN, Cholera and a series of recurring epidemics of Typhus, Scarlet Fever and Yellow Fever
1869Araucanía, southern ChileA smallpox epidemic breaks out among native Mapuches, just some months after a destructive Chilean military campaign in Araucanía.[44]
1877Los Angeles, CA
1880Tacna, PeruTacna hosted the combined armies of Peru and Bolivia before being defeated by Chile in the Battle of Tacna. Before it fell to Chileans in late May 1880 infectious diseases were widespread in the city with 461 deaths of smallpox in the 1879-1880 period, making up 11.3% of all registered deaths for the city in the same period.[45]
1902Boston, MassachusettsOf the 1,596 cases reported in this epidemic, 270 died.
1905Southern Patagonia, ChileA smallpox epidemic hits Tehuelche communities in Magallanes Territory, Chile.[46][47] Cacique José Mulato died in the epidemic.[47]


After first contacts with Europeans and Africans, some believe that the death of 90–95% of the native population of the New World was caused by Old World diseases.[48] It is suspected that smallpox was the chief culprit and responsible for killing nearly all of the native inhabitants of the Americas. For more than 200 years, this disease affected all new world populations, mostly without intentional European transmission, from contact in the early 16th century until possibly as late as the French and Indian Wars (1754–1767).[49]

In 1519 Hernán Cortés landed on the shores of what is now Mexico and what was then the Aztec Empire. In 1520 another group of Spanish arrived in Mexico from Hispaniola, bringing with them the smallpox which had already been ravaging that island for two years. When Cortés heard about the other group, he went and defeated them. In this contact, one of Cortés’s men contracted the disease. When Cortés returned to Tenochtitlan, he brought the disease with him.[citation needed]

Soon, the Aztecs rose up in rebellion against Cortés and his men. Outnumbered, the Spanish were forced to flee. In the fighting, the Spanish soldier carrying smallpox died. Cortés would not return to the capital until August 1521. In the meantime smallpox devastated the Aztec population. It killed most of the Aztec army and 25% of the overall population.[50] The Spanish Franciscan Motolinia left this description: “As the Indians did not know the remedy of the disease…they died in heaps, like bedbugs. In many places it happened that everyone in a house died and, as it was impossible to bury the great number of dead, they pulled down the houses over them so that their homes become their tombs.”[51] On Cortés’s return, he found the Aztec army’s chain of command in ruins. The soldiers who still lived were weak from the disease. Cortés then easily defeated the Aztecs and entered Tenochtitlán.[52] The Spaniards said that they could not walk through the streets without stepping on the bodies of smallpox victims.[53]

The effects of smallpox on Tahuantinsuyu (or the Inca empire) were even more devastating. Beginning in Colombia, smallpox spread rapidly before the Spanish invaders first arrived in the empire. The spread was probably aided by the efficient Inca road system. Within months, the disease had killed the Incan Emperor Huayna Capac, his successor, and most of the other leaders. Two of his surviving sons warred for power and, after a bloody and costly war, Atahualpa become the new emperor. As Atahualpa was returning to the capital Cuzco, Francisco Pizarro arrived and through a series of deceits captured the young leader and his best general. Within a few years smallpox claimed between 60% and 90% of the Inca population,[54] with other waves of European disease weakening them further. A handful of historians argue that a disease called Bartonellosis might have been responsible for some outbreaks of illness, but this opinion is in the scholarly minority.[55] The effects of Bartonellosis were depicted in the ceramics of the Moche people of ancient Peru.[56]

Even after the two largest empires of the Americas were defeated by the virus and disease, smallpox continued its march of death. In 1561, smallpox reached Chile by sea, when a ship carrying the new governor Francisco de Villagra landed at La Serena. Chile had previously been isolated by the Atacama Desert and Andes Mountains from Peru, but at the end of 1561 and in early 1562, it ravaged the Chilean native population. Chronicles and records of the time left no accurate data on mortality but more recent estimates are that the natives lost 20 to 25 percent of their population. The Spanish historian Marmolejo said that gold mines had to shut down when all their Indian labor died.[57] Mapuche fighting Spain in Araucanía regarded the epidemic as a magical attempt by Francisco de Villagra to exterminate them because he could not defeat them in the Arauco War.[33]

In 1633 in Plymouth, Massachusetts, the Native Americans were struck by the virus. As it had done elsewhere, the virus wiped out entire population groups of Native Americans. It reached Mohawks in 1634,[58] the Lake Ontario area in 1636, and the lands of the Iroquois by 1679.[59]

AIDS in Haiti

With an estimated 150,000 people living with HIV/AIDS in 2016 (or an approximately 2.1 percent prevalence rate among adults aged 15–49), Haiti has the most overall cases of HIV/AIDS in the Caribbean and its HIV prevalence rates among the highest percentage-wise in the region.[3] There are many risk-factor groups for HIV infection in Haiti, with the most common ones including lower socioeconomic status, lower educational levels, risky behavior, and lower levels of awareness regarding HIV and its transmission.[4][5]

AIDS in Sierra Leon

Sierra Leone is a low-income West African country that has dealt with waves of economic, political, and public health challenges in its recent past, including a decade-long brutal civil war and the Ebola epidemic of 2014-2016. The HIV/AIDS epidemic, which has raged on in the country since 1987, has long been characterized as stable.

AIDS in Benin

he number of adults and children living with HIV/AIDS in Benin in 2003 was estimated by the Joint United Nations Programme for HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) to range between 38,000 and 120,000, with nearly equal numbers of males and females. A recent study conducted by the National AIDS Control Program estimated the number of people living with HIV/AIDS to be 71,950. In 2003, an estimated 6,140 adults and children died of AIDS. Benin has a well-functioning system of antenatal HIV surveillance; in 2002, the median HIV prevalence at 36 antenatal clinics was 1.9%. Another study in 2002 showed an overall prevalence of 2.3% among adults in Cotonou, Benin’s largest city.[1]

AIDS in Niger

Prevalence

2007 estimates put the number of HIV positive Nigeriens at 60,000 or 0.8% of total population, with 4,000 deaths in that year.[1] United Nations estimates in 2008 gave similar figures, giving Niger one of the lowest infection rates on the continent.[2]

2008 estimates ranged from 44,000 to 85,000 people living with HIV in a nation of around 14 million, with an adult (aged 15 to 49) prevalence rate of between 0.6% and 1.1%. Adults aged 15 and up living with HIV were estimated to range from 42,000 to 81,000, with women of this age range making up about a third (12,000 to 26,000). Estimates of children (under 14) living with HIV were between 2,500 and 4,200. Total deaths were estimated to be between 3,000 and 5,600 per year. Aids orphans (under 17) were estimated at between 18,000 and 39,000.[2]

AIDS in Tanzania

Tanzania faces generalized HIV epidemic which means it affects all sections of the society but also concentrated epidemic among certain population groups. The prevalence of HIV/AIDS in Tanzania is characterised by substantial across age, gender, geographical location and socioeconomic status implying difference in the risk of transmission of infection.[1] In 2019, among 1.7 million people living with HIV/AIDS, the prevalence was 4.6% and 58,000 new HIV infection among 15–49 years old, and 6,500 new infections among children below 15 years old,[1] 50% of all new infections are between 15 – 29 years of age group.[2] Report from Tanzania PHIA of 2016/17 shows that HIV prevalence among women is higher (6.2%) than men (3.1%).[3] The prevalence of HIV is less than 2% among 15-19 years for both males and females and then increases with age for both sexes.[1]

AIDS in Congo

The Democratic Republic of the Congo is facing a large-scale growing HIV/AIDS epidemic, with an estimated national average adult prevalence of 4% and 1.19 million people living with HIV/AIDS at the end of 2005. The principal mode of transmission is heterosexual.

AIDS in Nigeria

HIV/AIDS originated in Africa during early 20th century and is a major public health concern and cause of death in many African countries. AIDS rates varies significantly between countries, though the majority of cases are concentrated in Southern Africa. Although the continent is home to about 15.2 percent of the world’s population,[1] more than two-thirds of the total infected worldwide – some 35 million people – were Africans, of whom 15 million have already died.[2]Eastern and Southern Africa alone accounted for an estimate of 60 percent of all people living with HIV[3] and 70 percent of all AIDS deaths in 2011.[4] The countries of Eastern and Southern Africa are most affected, AIDS has raised death rates and lowered life expectancy among adults between the ages of 20 and 49 by about twenty years.[2] Furthermore, the life expectancy in many parts of Africa is declining, largely as a result of the HIV/AIDS epidemic with life-expectancy in some countries reaching as low as thirty-nine years.

Conclusion

While there is some correlation in is not sufficient to prove causation even though it is suspicious,

Antibiotics, Vaccines, Polio, Viruses, Autoimmune Diseases, Bioterrorism-cont. Dr Tent Blows the Lid. 2023-06-03. Jorma A Jyrkkanen, BSc, PDP, Analyst

June 3, 2023
Antibiotics came out in 1942. In 1943 Polio broke out and kids were being paralyzed. What was in the vaccines that was causing polio? Monkey viruses were the prime suspect. His story is all about vaccines having all kinds of viruses that cause cancer and other diseases. In 1955 a polio vaccine was rushed into production. They put formaldehyde into the vaccine. Dr. Bernice Eddy said it should be tested first. They did on Monkeys and they became paralyzed. Kids got sick from polio vaccine and were paralyzed. The polio vaccine never stopped polio. Better sanitation stopped it.

Deadly Viruses Were Being Disseminated in Vaccines

Inner Connections>Welcome to Inner Connections>Cafe>Cafe, Fun Things Archived>

The Exploding Autoimmune Epidemic – Dr. Tent – It’s Not Autoimmune, you have Viruses.
Crochet Sue IC Angel

Jan 29, 2013#1
The Exploding Autoimmune Epidemic – Dr. Tent – It’s Not Autoimmune, you have Viruses.
This is about vaccines, they contain viruses that cause all kinds of diseases.
I am watching this video and it is very interesting. It’s 2 hrs long and I realize most do not have the time to watch it so I’m taking notes. I was taking notes for one of my sisters, and decided to post them here too. I have only watched
a half hour so far and will post the notes I took below. I will post more as I watch it, which I won’t be watching anymore tonight, but over the next few days.
In this first half hour he is talking about the vaccines causing cancer. He hasn’t talked about vaccines causing autoimmune diseases yet. I am interested to get to that part as scleroderma, which Gabby had, {I Jorma Jyrkkanen have scleroderma and have had Polio vaccines as a kid in about 1951} is also an
autoimmune disease that starts out the same as arthritis but gets much worse when it attacks internal organs.

Jan 29, 2013#2
Notes from the first half hour:
They thought a virus was the cause of cancer in the early 50’s
In 1999 to 2001, 60 Minutes investigated this story and they put more money
and time into than any other story they ever aired. They said there is no way
they can air this so they didn’t.
1942 antibiotics were released, 1943 polio became an epidemic. Polo mimicked
the flu so people were treated with antibiotics when they really had polo
.
1955 a polo vaccine was rushed into productions. They put formaldeyde in
the vaccine. Dr. Bernice Eddy said they should test it first, she tried it on
monkeys and they were paralyzed. She tried to get them to halt the vaccine
but they did it anyway. Kids got sick from polio and were paralyzed.

The polo vaccine never stopped polio, it was stopped by people practicing
better santitation and refrigeration methods.
Dr. Eddy was taken off the polio research. She and Dr. Sarah Stewart discovered
that cancer is caused by a virus.

The vaccine manufacturers were growing their polio viruses on the kidneys
of monkeys and when they removed the polio virus from the monkey kidneys
they also removed an unknown number of other monkey viruses with it.
In 1959 Dr. Bernice Eddy found overwhelming evidence that they had just
inoculated an entire generation with cancer-causing monkey viruses.
She predicted an epidemic of cancer. There is 40 monkey viruses in
the vaccines. [JJ comment: SV40 is the culprit we now know]
The government made it classified and would no longer allow information
about it out to the public. Everyone still has these viruses from the vaccines inside of them. If you get
a blood sample analyzed they would find these viruses in it.

In 1960 Dr. Bernice Eddy gave a talk to the New York Cancer Society and announced
that she examined the monkey kidney cells in which the polio virus was grown and
found they were infected with cancer-causing viruses, SV-40.
They crushed Bernice Eddy professionally. They took away her lab, destroyed
her animals, put her under a gag order and delayed publication of her scientific
papers.
In 1961 federal regulations went into effect that required that the polio vaccines
be free of SV40 but they did NOT require the SV40 contaminated seeds used to
make every batch or lot of vaccine be discarded nor the recently manufactured
contaminated vaccines be discarded. They continued giving the contaminated
vaccines to children and adults until they were used up sometime in 1963.
In 1962 Sabin Oral Polio vaccine is introduced but they used the same culture
medium, the monkey kidneys. This was the vaccine put into the sugar cube
that everyone took back then. It is estimated that 1 out of every 200 people
are getting cancer caused by SV40.

They started to realize that cancers rarely seen such as lung, breast, prostate,
lymphoma, brain and melanoma increased 50% over a 16 year period. Lung
cancer is rising because the vaccine is causing it, not smoking. As smoking has
gone down, lung cancer has gone up.

The vaccine developers did not want to release this information. They said it
would scare the public unnecessarily. If they hear that their children were
injected with a cancer virus that would not be very good.
Men born between 1948 and 1957 have 3x as much cancer not related to smoking.
The study’s researchers insist the increase cannot be explained by smoking,
better diagnosis or an again population. Public Health Official, Devra Lee Davis
said “There’s something else going on here.”
The SV40 virus is also sexually transmitted and you can get it from a blood
transfusion and it is spread from mother to child even if they had never got the
vaccine shots. Those never inoculated with the contaminated vaccine inherits it
up from their parents and can pass it on or infect their children and grandchildren.
This information has been blacked out from history.

There is also a virus in the vaccine that acts like AIDS.
Robert Gallo’s group at the NCI and Litton Bionetics also experimented with other
simian and human cancer viruses (e.g., SV40), and developed recombinants (i.e. mutants)
of these with other viral nucleic acids including those that caused the prominent
features of AIDS — WBC dysfunction, leukemias, lymphomas, sarcomas,
progressive wasting, and ultimate death in cats, mice, chickens, and humans.

See also https://www.facebook.com/TruthIsTerrorism/videos/maurice-hilleman-was-responsible-for-developing-more-than-40-vaccines-including-/1955638617986347/

SV40 and HIV fragment found in covid-19 vaccines. This suggest bioterrorists are still using experience from the 1950s and 1960s to make people sick by producing epidemics and big profits for Big Pharma.

Biden-US Govt DOD Funded ECOHEALTH In Wuhan and 46 others in Ukraine 2023-01-30 in possible contravention of the Geneva Convention Prohibiting Biological Weapons. Jorma Antero Jyrkkanen BSc, PDP

February 2, 2023

Truth and Justice More. https://twitter.com/SpartaJustice/status/1626317570784501760

Truth Justice ™

@SpartaJustice

GOVERNMENT CRIMES: They paid doctors and nurses to murder innocent patients. They faked Covid cases and deaths to instill fear in the population. They denied safe early treatments murdering millions of innocent people. They forced ineffective toxic Covid vaccines on the world. They Censored anyone sharing life saving early treatment information and anyone who warned about the dangers of the Covd vaccines. The Governments willfully committed crimes against humanity.

Biden-US Govt DOD Funded ECOHEALTH In Wuhan and 46 others in Ukraine 2023-01-30, Jorma Antero Jyrkkanen BSc, PDP

What we know.

  1. Five days ago, 25 January, Senator Joni Ernst called for US Government to Quit Funding ECOHEALTH WHICH IS RUN BY CEO Dr. Peter Daszak.
    https://www.ernst.senate.gov/news/press-releases/ernst-says-defund-ecohealth-alliance-after-investigation-reveals-their-mismanagement-of-covid-experiments-in-wuhan-china

The Iowa senator introduced legislation to permanently defund EcoHealth Alliance.

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) is calling on Congress to put an immediate and permanent end to taxpayer funding of EcoHealth Alliance following the release of an investigation today that found the organization mismanaged coronavirus experiments in Wuhan, China.

Senator Ernst requested the investigation by the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) upon learning that EcoHealth was spending tax dollars on dangerous coronaviruses in Communist China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and was not disclosing information about those projects to the public, as required by law.

The investigation found EcoHealth, WIV, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were all at fault for mismanagement:

EcoHealth did not immediately notify NIH when a coronavirus was enhanced to become more lethal, as required; and, when it did, NIH did not quickly act to have the pathogen reviewed for pandemic potential.
EcoHealth misspent tens of thousands of tax dollars on bonuses, junkets, and other unallowable costs.
China’s WIV did not cooperate.</b>

The OIG suggests that WIV should be permanently barred from receiving U.S. taxpayer dollars, EcoHealth should return misspent taxpayer money, and NIH should increase oversight of EcoHealth and other projects involving pathogens with pandemic potential.

Ernst’s response to the HHS investigation:

“While NIH certainly shares in the blame, EcoHealth Alliance is ultimately at fault for failing to tell the world what was really going on at China’s Wuhan Institute. They are guilty of either complacency or a cover-up, or maybe a little of both,” said Ernst.“EcoHealth was paid millions, promising their hunt for bat viruses would protect the world from a pandemic…well, the world got a pandemic, and EcoHealth keeps getting millions. We can’t afford any more of EcoHealth’s ‘prevention’ efforts. That’s why we mustpermanently ban them from receiving taxpayer dollars ever again.”

Since the world learned of the COVID-19 pandemic at the beginning of 2020 – including the role EcoHealth might have played in a potential lab leak— EcoHealth has been given more than $40 million in taxpayer dollars. Just last month, the Biden administration awarded the group $3 million out of the Department of Defense (DOD) budget.

Ernst’s response to the administration’s latest check to EcoHealth:

The Biden administration is funding EcoHealth to search for risky viruses in places all across the globe, except where they might actually find them: in their own lab experiments! Washington is looking for ways to trim spending, so let’s start by cutting the millions of dollars flowing to EcoHealth’s batty experiments,” said Ernst.

Biden and Hunters Crimes Covered Up for Optics

et

See new Tweets

Conversation

KanekoaTheGreat

@KanekoaTheGreat

IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley’s opening statement on Department of Justice Corruption and the Biden Family’s Crimes: “I’m here to tell you that the Delaware US Attorney’s Office and Department of Justice’s handling of the Hunter Biden tax investigation was very different from any other case my 14 years at the IRS. At every stage decisions were made that benefited the subject of this investigation. For example, prosecutors conceal contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop from investigators. DOJ slow walked steps to include interviews, serving document requests, and executing search warrants. Warrents that we’re ready as early as April of 2020, but were delayed until after the November 2020 election, and never pursued. Investigators were not allowed to follow up on WhatsApp messages from Hunter Biden’s Apple iCloud backup, where he suggested he was sitting next to his father. Assistant United States Attorney Leslie Wolf cited the optics of executing a search warrant at President Biden’s residence as a deciding factor for not allowing it even though she agreed that probable cause existed. Prosecutors instructed investigators not to ask about the big guy or dad when conducting interviews. The Biden transition team was tipped off about interviews the night before the investigation went over. A fact that my FBI counterpart confirmed to this committee in recent testimony where the result was only one witness spoke to investigators that day. These are just some of the examples of how our investigation was stymied. I’m not here to support partisan agendas on either side. I’m here because our tax system relies on the American people having confidence it is administered fairly and equally for everyone, regardless of your last name, or political connections… After our investigation largely concluded by the end of 2021, the IRS recommended charging Hunter Biden with multiple felonies and several misdemeanors for the tax years of 2014 through 2019. The Delaware assistance United States Attorneys and tax evasion trial attorneys supported charging the felonies and misdemeanors listed in Exhibit two of my interview transcripts… Attorney General Garland led Congress to believe the case was insulated from improper political influence because all decisions were being made exclusively by Delaware US Attorneey David Weiss, but that was not true. The Justice Department allowed the President’s political appointees to weigh in on whether they charged the president’s son. After US Attorney for DC, Mathew Graves, appointed by President Biden refused to bring charges in March 2022, I watched US Attorney Weiss tell a roomful of senior FBI and IRS leaders on October 7, 2022, that he was not the deciding person on whether charges were filed. That was my red line. I had already seen a pattern of preferential treatment and obstruction. Now, US Attorney Weiss was admitting that what the American people believed based on the Attorney General’s sworn statement was false. I could no longer stay silent…”

2. Yesterday Russia claimed Labs in Ukraine created the covid problem.

3. Zelensky Ordered Destruction of All State Docs Associated with METABIOTA on 02/24/22. WAS METABIOTA DOING ILLEGAL STUFF regarding covid in Ukraine and why would Selensky order Dept of Defense Records on METABIOTA destroyed??

USA ADMITS RUNNING 46 LABS IN UKRAINE JUNE 14 2022. TO WHAT PURPOSE???
https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/after-months-of-denial-u-s-admits-to-running-ukraine-biolabs/

Legal Ramifications of Conducting Secret Research on biowarfare capable pathogens stem from an International Convention on Pathogensx for the purpose of military use. The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), or Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), is a disarmament treaty that effectively bans biological and toxin weapons by prohibiting their development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling and use.

The Convention Articles
Biological Weapons Convention

Preamble

Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction

The States Parties to this Convention,

Determined to act with a view to achieving effective progress towards general and complete disarmament, including the prohibition and elimination of all types of weapons of mass destruction, and convinced that the prohibition of the development, production and stockpiling of chemical and bacteriological (biological) weapons and their elimination, through effective measures, will facilitate the achievement of general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control,

Recognizing the important significance of the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological (Pathogens) Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925, and conscious also of the contribution which the said Protocol has already made and continues to make, to mitigating the horrors of war,

Reaffirming their adherence to the principles and objectives of that Protocol and calling upon all States to comply strictly with them,

Recalling that the General Assembly of the United Nations has repeatedly condemned all actions contrary to the principles and objectives of the Geneva Protocol of 17 June 1925,

Desiring to contribute to the strengthening of confidence between peoples and the general improvement of the international atmosphere,

Desiring also to contribute to the realization of the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations,

Convinced of the importance and urgency of eliminating from the arsenals of States, through effective measures, such dangerous weapons of mass destruction as those using chemical or bacteriological (biological) agents,

Recognizing that an agreement on the prohibition of bacteriological (biological) and toxin weapons represents a first possible step towards the achievement of agreement on effective measures also for the prohibition of the development, production and stockpiling of chemical weapons, and determined to continue negotiations to that end,

Determined, for the sake of all mankind, to exclude completely the possibility of bacteriological (biological) agents and toxins being used as weapons,

Convinced that such use would be repugnant to the conscience of mankind and that no effort should be spared to minimize this risk,

Have agreed as follows:
Article I

Each State Party to this Convention undertakes never in any circumstances to develop, produce, stockpile or otherwise acquire or retain:

(1) microbial or other biological agents, or toxins whatever their origin or method of production, of types and in quantities that have no justification for prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes;

(2) weapons, equipment or means of delivery designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict.
Article II

Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to destroy, or to divert to peaceful purposes, as soon as possible but not later than nine months after the entry into force of the Convention, all agents, toxins, weapons, equipment and means of delivery specified in Article I of the Convention, which are in its possession or under its jurisdiction or control. In implementing the provisions of this Article all necessary safety precautions shall be observed to protect populations and the environment.
Article III

Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever, directly or indirectly, and not in any way to assist, encourage, or induce any State, group of States or international organizations to manufacture or otherwise acquire any of the agents, toxins, weapons, equipment or means of delivery specified in Article I of the Convention.
Article IV

Each State Party to this Convention shall, in accordance with its constitutional processes, take any necessary measures to prohibit and prevent the development, production, stockpiling, acquisition or retention of the agents, toxins, weapons, equipment and means of delivery specified in Article I of the Convention, within the territory of such State, under its jurisdiction or under its control anywhere.
Article V

The States Parties to this Convention undertake to consult one another and to co-operate in solving any problems which may arise in relation to the objective of, or in the application of the provisions of, the Convention. Consultation and co-operation pursuant to this Article may also be undertaken through appropriate international procedures within the framework of the United Nations and in accordance with its Charter.
Article VI

(1) Any State Party to this Convention which finds that any other State Party is acting in breach of obligations deriving from the provisions of the Convention may lodge a complaint with the Security Council of the United Nations. Such a complaint should include all possible evidence confirming its validity, as well as a request for its consideration by the Security Council.

(2) Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to co-operate in carrying out any investigation which the Security Council may initiate, in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, on the basis of the complaint received by the Council. The Security Council shall inform the States Parties to the Convention of the results of the investigation.
Article VII

Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to provide or support assistance, in accordance with the United Nations Charter, to any Party to the Convention which so requests, if the Security Council decides that such Party has been exposed to danger as a result of violation of the Convention.
Article VIII

Nothing in this Convention shall be interpreted as in any way limiting or detracting from the obligations assumed by any State under the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925.
Article IX

Each State Party to this Convention affirms the recognized objective of effective prohibition of chemical weapons and, to this end, undertakes to continue negotiations in good faith with a view to reaching early agreement on effective measures for the prohibition of their development, production and stockpiling and for their destruction, and on appropriate measures concerning equipment and means of delivery specifically designed for the production or use of chemical agents for weapons purposes.
Article X

(1) The States Parties to this Convention undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the use of bacteriological (biological) agents and toxins for peaceful purposes. Parties to the Convention in a position to do so shall also co-operate in contributing individually or together with other States or international organisations to the further development and application of scientific discoveries in the field of bacteriology (biology) for the prevention of disease, or for other peaceful purposes.

(2) This Convention shall be implemented in a manner designed to avoid hampering the economic or technological development of States Parties to the Convention or international co-operation in the field of peaceful bacteriological (biological) activities, including the international exchange of bacteriological (biological) agents and toxins and equipment for the processing, use or production of bacteriological (biological) agents and toxins for peaceful purposes in accordance with the provisions of the Convention.
Article XI

Any State Party may propose amendments to this Convention. Amendments shall enter into force for each State Party accepting the amendments upon their acceptance by a majority of the States Parties to the Convention and thereafter for each remaining State Party on the date of acceptance by it.
Article XII

Five years after the entry into force of this Convention, or earlier if it is requested by a majority of Parties to the Convention by submitting a proposal to this effect to the Depository Governments, a conference of States Parties to the Convention shall be held at Geneva, Switzerland, to review the operation of the Convention, with a view to assuring that the purposes of the preamble and the provisions of the Convention, including the provisions concerning negotiations on chemical weapons, are being realized. Such review shall take into account any new scientific and technological developments relevant to the Convention.
Article XIII

(1) This Convention shall be of unlimited duration.

(2) Each State Party to this Convention shall in exercising its national sovereignty have the right to withdraw from the Convention if it decides that extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of the Convention, have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other States Parties to the Convention and to the United Nations Security Council three months in advance. Such notice shall include a statement of the extraordinary events it regards as having jeopardized its supreme interests.
Article XIV

(1) This Convention shall be open to all States for signature. Any State which does not sign the Convention before its entry into force in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article may accede to it at any time.

(2) This Convention shall be subject to ratification by signatory States. Instruments of ratification and instruments of accession shall be deposited with the Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United States of America, which are hereby designated the Depositary Governments.

(3) This Convention shall enter into force after the deposit of instruments of ratification by twenty-two Governments, including the Governments designated as Depositories of the Convention.

(4) For States whose instruments of ratification or accession are deposited subsequent to the entry into force of this Convention, it shall enter into force on the date of the deposit of their instruments of ratification or accession.

(5) The Depository Governments shall promptly inform all signatory and acceding States of the date of each signature, the date of deposit of each instrument of ratification or of accession and the date of the entry into force of this Convention, and of the receipt of other notices.

(6) This Convention shall be registered by the Depository Governments pursuant to Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations.
Article XV
This Convention, the English, Russian, French, Spanish and Chinese texts of which are equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the Depositary Governments. Duly certified copies of the Convention shall be transmitted by the Depositary Governments to the Governments of the signatory and acceding States.

Edits. This page was last edited on 15 February 2021, at 20:26.
THE AFOREMENTIONED DOCUMENTS ARE STRONG CLUES THAT THE AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION AND BIDENS IN PARTICULAR MAY HAVE VIOLATED THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS BY COVERT FUNDING OF PATHOGENS CAPABLE OF CAUSING A PANDEMIC AND SHOULD BE REFERRED TO INTERPOL AND THE ICC AND UN SECRETARIAT ON BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS FOR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION.